First of all, let me clear that ASP.NET MVC is not replacing ASP.NET WebForms. Both these development models exist and can be used to develop ASP.NET applications. Although both has pros and cons.
ASP.NET Web Forms
|
ASP.NET MVC
|
ASP.NET Web Forms uses Page controller pattern approach for
rendering layout. In this approach, every page has it's own controller i.e.
code-behind file that processes the request.
|
ASP.NET MVC uses Front Controller approach. That approach
means ,a common controller for all pages, processes the requests.
|
No separation of concerns. As we discussed that every page
(.aspx) has it's own controller (code behind i.e. aspx.cs/.vb file), so both
are tightly coupled.
|
Very clean separation of concerns. View and Controller are
neatly separate.
|
Because of this coupled behavior, automated testing is really
difficult.
|
Testability is key feature in ASP.NET MVC. Test driven
development is quite simple using this approach.
|
In order to achieve stateful behavior, viewstate is used.
Purpose was to give developers, the same experience of a typical WinForms
application.
|
ASP.NET MVC approach is stateless as that of the web. So here
no concept of viewstate.
|
Statefulness has a lots of problem for web environment in case
of excessively large viewstate. Large viewstate means increase in page size.
|
As controller and view are not dependent and also no viewstate
concept in ASP.NET MVC, so output is very clean.
|
ASP.NET WebForms model follows a Page Life cycle.
|
No Page Life cycle like WebForms. Request cycle is simple in
ASP.NET MVC model.
|
Along with statefulness, microsoft tries to introduce
server-side controls as in Windows applications. Purpose was to provide
somehow an abstraction to the details of HTML. In ASP.NET Web Forms,
minimal knowledge of HTML, JavaScript and CSS is required.
|
In MVC, detailed knowledge of HTML, JavaScript and CSS is
required.
|
Above abstraction was good but provides limited control over
HTML, JavaScript and CSS which is necessary in many cases.
|
Full control over HTML, JavaScript and CSS.
|
With a lots of control libraries availability and limited
knowledge of other related technologies, ASP.NET WebForms is RAD(Rapid
Application Development) approach.
|
It's a step back. For developers decrease in productivity.
|
It’s good for small scale applications with limited team size.
|
It’s better as well as recommended approach for large-scale
applications where different teams are working together.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment